多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:490Please respect copyright.PENANAOeAEke6900
490Please respect copyright.PENANALTYI9BAz2x
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?490Please respect copyright.PENANAPJ3aKkSGYB
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區490Please respect copyright.PENANArXv5Xu3DwM
https://lih.kg/2544217490Please respect copyright.PENANAch90CbYSYl
490Please respect copyright.PENANAHfoxYlnipd
490Please respect copyright.PENANAq0qvImsvhw
圖片摘取自Ref1及2490Please respect copyright.PENANAB4GLKGxN4B490Please respect copyright.PENANAwxosd6v1Fc
490Please respect copyright.PENANAQ8HhkrRMSN
490Please respect copyright.PENANAoEE7BhJwdx
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。490Please respect copyright.PENANAxDpE3KxcHU
490Please respect copyright.PENANAGZkrVdU1Tj
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。490Please respect copyright.PENANAB20K7bAvBx
490Please respect copyright.PENANAPlPB1UGAKJ
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。490Please respect copyright.PENANAqrDOFmdXrB
490Please respect copyright.PENANAIfefuxjgEP
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。490Please respect copyright.PENANAY9FV1BR0Az
490Please respect copyright.PENANABymgSLUB7F
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5490Please respect copyright.PENANAJdyHxh6U9u
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
490Please respect copyright.PENANAQfKv2I8109