多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:315Please respect copyright.PENANA8OtXkdB63Y
315Please respect copyright.PENANA9gQm8peSyG
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?315Please respect copyright.PENANAIHrSMLrShu
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區315Please respect copyright.PENANAGwu9E1wyfp
https://lih.kg/2544217315Please respect copyright.PENANAAyaJVoir76
315Please respect copyright.PENANADkLYpp2fvw
315Please respect copyright.PENANAqYRCz6xnwx
圖片摘取自Ref1及2315Please respect copyright.PENANAKNRe2n0FxJ
315Please respect copyright.PENANAYGUsFwvUJV
315Please respect copyright.PENANA1bwMcgSYc6
315Please respect copyright.PENANAaCEIYM9rM9
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。315Please respect copyright.PENANAgAdgtAnoI4
315Please respect copyright.PENANAgvQzkxPF0L
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。315Please respect copyright.PENANAgU1gqNyPXI
315Please respect copyright.PENANA12TxTbf6hd
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。315Please respect copyright.PENANAqwZyj899oy
315Please respect copyright.PENANA3mPcGWYh5w
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。315Please respect copyright.PENANAL2y1Srbh4S
315Please respect copyright.PENANAmlsFOMfh64
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5315Please respect copyright.PENANA8csu5z1oyR
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
315Please respect copyright.PENANAXTV01yHwxg